Dear Margaret Gibson,
My name is Hayden and I am from Newtown, CT. I was drawn in by your poem, “It Doesn’t Take Much”, and thrilled to learn that you are the poet laureate of Connecticut!
The imagery in your poem, such as “a blossom of blood on the stone”, connected burgeoning life and certain death. Your detailed description of the frog allowed me to relate to it and feel as the person who found it would have. Are you the person who found it? Is this poem modeled after an event in your life?
I wonder what you meant by “Or is the dead frog an ambassador sent from the wetland world?” Was the injured frog a warning, something to pull our attention and teach us. Maybe you are meaning a symbol of climate change? Further, it may be about humans’ need to learn about our world and the balance of all living things. I can relate to your sentiment, “It doesn’t take much to make me see how little I know about the simplest things.”
I noticed that, on the written version of your poem, the lines “And so I carry the frog”, as well as, “And turn back to your own.” were indented more than the other lines. Why is this? Do you have any poem-writing techniques or suggestions?
At the end of your poem, I found myself in reflective silence: “When death arrives on your door stone, you think about it. When death turns out to be life, injured life, you’re glad. And turn back to your own.” This may mean that the person who found the frog was consumed with thoughts about it when they found it to be dead. The frog was able to transition from a symbol of hopelessness to one of hope, even fragile hope, as the brown bag began to jump. Hope can be freeing. Now that they see that the frog has life, they return to thinking about themselves, thinking about their own life, perhaps their own fragile existence, and the time that they have. I wonder what you were intending it to mean?
After dusk, as the human world is drawing a quiet curtain on the day, nature is reaching a crescendo. I regularly listen for any of the 11 species of Connecticut frogs at a nearby wetland, and record my findings. The care required to learn the frog calls and listen for individual sounds reminds of the care that the person in your poem took to not ignore that single frog. When I hear a loud chorus of spring peepers, it is nearly impossible to pick out any individual voices. Each of those frogs is somehow less “significant”, even though they are still each calling out for their individual needs. Who would know if one or maybe even tens of them were snatched up by a voracious raptor? In comparison, hearing a pickerel frog is like a pearl found on the muddy shores. There are only a few, sometimes even just one lonely creaking door croak. I hold my breath, imagining its transparent, stretched out vocal sac, like a balloon about to pop, as I await its music...its guiro-like call. If a snake ate that one pickerel frog, I would keep listening and listening for that call that had ceased from existence. Like the frog on your door stone, why can the gravity of one pull us so powerfully?
After reading your poem, I was inspired to write a poem about something similar that I experienced:
Silent Squawk
A happy nest of squawking, slimy,
V-shaped mouths
await food from their mother,
while tiny, silent, puff of down lies
far below,
neglected by sister and brother.
We approach the sporadic chirping,
quietly,
pick it up and hoist it high,
back to the nest where it belongs,
still silent,
is there room for it to occupy?
A day later, the baby again pushed
to the dirt;
louder than redundant noise above,
we hear its tiny, hushed, pleas,
pick it up,
bring it where it will be loved.
Here even as the fittest we
were appalled
by survival of the fittest; we were compelled,
to have sympathy for and help those
who were weak,
who were hurt and could not rescue themselves.
Thank you for the inspiration,
Hayden